You are here: Home Community Blog 2008 December Which Creates More Jobs?

Which Creates More Jobs?

Posted by Chris Hagerbaumer at Dec 01, 2008 04:22 PM |

In the face of a serious recession, lawmakers at both the state and federal level are calling for investment in infrastructure projects, such as roads, that will bring the unemployment rate down while addressing what’s seen as an infrastructure crisis.

In the face of a serious recession, lawmakers at both the state and federal level are calling for investment in infrastructure projects, such as roads, that will bring the unemployment rate down while addressing what’s seen as an infrastructure crisis.

And they’re absolutely right. Such jobs pay well, and our infrastructure needs are large. But let’s invest strategically. Real world experience points to two things.

First, “fix it first” types of projects – such as resurfacing, rehabilitating and reconstructing roads – are generally more labor intensive than new highway construction (after adjusting for land costs, which are necessary when building an entirely new road but are not relevant when upgrading an existing one). “The Jobs Are Back in Town,” [PDF] a 2003 study by Good Jobs First, found that “for every $1 billion spent on federally-aided highway resurfacing projects, some 10,421 person-years of construction labor were generated, while with new highway construction (after adjusting for land costs) only 9,316 person-years were created.” And “fix it first” benefits drivers’ pocketbooks; cracked and bumpy roads increase car maintenance costs and reduce fuel efficiency. 

Second, investing in new public transportation infrastructure generally creates more jobs than investing in new highway and bridge infrastructure. A 2004 study by the Surface Transportation Policy Project, Setting the Record Straight: Transit, Fixing Roads and Bridges Offer Greatest Job Gains”, [PDF] found that for every $1.25 billion spent on new public transportation projects, nearly 51,300 people are employed. In contrast, only 43,200 are employed per $1.25 billion spent on new roads and bridges. In other words, investment in public transportation creates approximately 19% more jobs than new road or bridge projects. And during an economic downturn, we need public transportation more than ever. Growing numbers of Oregonians have no choice other than to take transit.

Let’s leverage the most jobs, the most economic benefit and the most social good with wise transportation infrastructure investments. 

Fuel Economy

Posted by Brenda Pace at Dec 05, 2008 11:16 AM
I was disappointed that the state budget revenue included increases in registration fees but did NOT scale these to the weight and fuel economy of the vehicles. Both numbers are readily ascertained and a scaled fee would be a closer link to the damage caused to highways (weight) and the impact on air qualtiy and global warming (MPG). Scaling the fee would be another way to demonstrate these links and, thereby, encourage the public to buy less harmful vehicles. Instead of being just another tax, the registration fee would be closer to a service fee.

Fuel Economy

Posted by Chris Hagerbaumer at Dec 05, 2008 03:07 PM
The Governor's Vision Committee did look into that option. In fact, the Oregon Business Association put a lot of thought into a fee that would vary by both fuel economy and mileage. (And back in 2003, OEC proposed such legislation, which we called a "Climate-Friendly" registration fee.) However, delving deeper, the Committee found that the administrative hurdles were large, and the Oregon Trucking Association (OTA) had issues with the concept. Under "cost responsibility" the weight-mile fee paid by heavy-duty vehicles is keyed off of what light-duty vehicles pay; the OTA felt the variable registration fee would make it difficult to measure in advance what the truckers would be required to pay and was uncomfortable with that uncertainty. So, after conversing further, the Committee decided to recommend a variable one-time title fee. This means that any car registered for the first time in Oregon (a new car, or a car coming into the state) will pay $100, with a $50 discount if the car gets 30 miles per gallon or greater. Personally, I feel that unless the variance is large (whether it be a registration fee or a title fee), car-buying decisions are unlikely to be influenced. I'd much rather see a larger increase in the gas tax.

Updates by Email
It's Your Oregon. Stay informed, have a say, sign up for our e-news!
Privacy Policy
 
Personal tools
powered by Plone | site by Groundwire and served with clean energy